The Vital Role of Primary Care

 

The Role Primary Care Plays in Improving Outcomes for Patients with Multiple Myeloma

 

Primary care physicians serve as the frontline in identifying multiple myeloma patients and shaping their subsequent medical journey. Because the symptoms of multiple myeloma, such as back pain, bone pain and fatigue, can be nonspecific and overlap with other conditions, it can be easy to overlook or misinterpret during office visits with the patient1. However, by maintaining a heightened awareness and suspicion for multiple myeloma, you can ensure timely referrals for further evaluation and specialist consultations. A proactive approach in primary care can significantly improve patient outcomes, as a prolonged time to diagnosis is associated with more complications and worse patient outcomes2. Recognizing that multiple myeloma can disguise itself with common symptoms allows you to guide patients toward an appropriate care pathway and enhance their quality of life.

 

Improve Outcomes for Patients with a Plasma Cell Disorder

 

Delays Lead to Clinical Complications

 

On average, three visits to Primary Care occur before a multiple myeloma patient is referred to a hematologist, often resulting in a delayed diagnosis3. The likelihood of debilitating complications such as bone disease, anemia, renal impairment, neurological disease, and infections can significantly increase with a delay in diagnosis. In a study, 100% of patients developed complications when their diagnosis was longer than six months from when symptoms were presented.2 Further, a diagnostic delay of greater than six months increased the incidence of renal impairment and bone disease in those patients by 2.6 and 2.5 times, respectively, compared to patients diagnosed within 3 months.2 This diagnostic interval and time from disease onset to therapeutic intervention can impact disease-free survival, meaning lower quality of life and higher economic impact for the patient and the health system. Inversely, early diagnosis and initiation of treatment are associated with better outcomes2.

 

Understanding the Patient You are Diagnosing

 

Multiple Myeloma and its Relation to Monoclonal Gammopathies

 

Multiple myeloma is a hematologic cancer that is characterized by the clonal proliferation of malignant plasma cells in the bone marrow4. It typically evolves from the emergence and unchecked expansion of clonal premalignant plasma cells. This pre-malignancy, known as monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), can progress to multiple myeloma as the cell population undergoes further transformation events4. These pre-malignant and malignant plasma cells typically retain their capability to produce antibodies, a useful biomarker for their presence in the body. The invasion of the plasma cells into adjacent bone, alongside the overproduction of antibodies (M-proteins) can lead to various complications such as bone disease, anemia, renal dysfunction, and a compromised immune system.4

 

 

 

Who is at High Risk of Multiple Myeloma?

Because the symptoms of multiple myeloma are nonspecific and have significant overlap with more common conditions, primary care providers should be aware of high-risk groups for whom they should have heightened awareness of myeloma signs and symptoms. Those demographics that have enhanced risk for multiple myeloma include:

  • Increasing age: Myeloma is most frequently diagnosed among people aged 65-74.5
  • Male sex: Men are more likely to develop the disease than women.5
  • Race: Myeloma incidence is > 2-fold higher in African American/Blacks than Whites.5
  • Family history of multiple myeloma: Having a first-degree relative with multiple myeloma or any lympho-hematopoietic cancer, such as non-Hodgkin lymphoma, leukemia, or Hodgkin lymphoma, translates to an increased risk.6
  • Personal history of a monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS): Previous diagnoses of premalignant MGUS increase a patient’s risk of progressing to multiple myeloma.1

 

Signs and symptoms

Symptoms of multiple myeloma can vary extensively. In the early stages of the disease, patients may not experience any indicators but inevitably will begin to demonstrate general symptoms that may include1:

  • Bone pain (especially lower back, hips, and skull)
  • Fatigue
  • Neuropathy
  • Bruising/bleeding
  • Recurrent infections
  • Raynaud phenomenon
  • Hyperviscosity symptoms
  • Pathologic fractures

Multiple basic laboratory abnormalities that are also suggestive of multiple myeloma include1:

  • Anemia
  • Elevated Creatinine
  • Hypercalcemia
  • Elevated total protein
  • Low anion gap
  • Unexplained proteinuria
  • Low albumin
  • Hypo- or hyper-gammaglobulinemia
  • Elevated ESR

 

What is the Diagnostic Work-up of Multiple Myeloma?

 

Previously, a diagnosis of active, symptomatic multiple myeloma required the presence of clonal bone marrow plasma cells at >10% and any one or more of the common attributes associated with the disease: hypercalcemia, renal failure, anemia, or bone disease (CRAB). To facilitate diagnosis at an earlier stage, and thus enhance the efficacy of therapeutic intervention, the definition has been modified to include as a myeloma-defining events three biomarkers of malignancy: ≥60% bone marrow plasma cell, >1 focal lesion detected through MRI, and validated biomarkers associated with the monoclonal protein, i.e., an involved/uninvolved serum free light chain ratio ≥100, provided that the involved FLC is ≥100 mg/L.7

Proper diagnostic work-up of multiple myeloma, when multiple suggestive signs and symptoms are present, should involve a comprehensive panel of tests. In addition to clinical symptoms, routine bloodwork can also support a s suspicion of multiple myeloma. A complete blood count (CBC) and quantification of lactate dehydrogenase, electrolytes, total protein, albumin, and creatinine are important general tests to assess blood and renal function as well as to determine abnormalities in blood protein content. If initial tests are suggestive of potential myeloma, serum protein electrophoresis (SPE), serum free light chain testing (sFLC), and immunofixation (IFE) are appropriate next steps that can help optimize referrals to hematology.1 In some cases, imaging for lytic lesions may also be appropriate.

 

Recommendations for Diagnostic Testing

 

Historically, serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) alone has been used to detect and measure monoclonal gammopathies. Guidelines now recommend combining serum free light chains (sFLC) with SPE and serum immunofixation (sIFE) to achieve the highest diagnostic sensitivity for these conditions. Together, these assays detect > 99% of cases of multiple myeloma and > 94% of all monoclonal gammopathies, setting your patients on the most reliable path to diagnosis and treatment8.

By recognizing the early symptoms and employing the correct diagnostic tests, you have the power to set the trajectory for better patient outcomes.

 

By recognizing the early symptoms and employing the correct diagnostic tests, you have the power to set the trajectory for better patient outcomes.

 

For more information about our Monoclonal Gammopathy Dx Panel 

Click here to have someone from our team contact you

References

  1. Mikhael, J.; Bhutani, M.; Cole, C. E. Multiple Myeloma for the Primary Care Provider: A Practical Review to Promote Earlier Diagnosis Among Diverse Populations. Am. J. Med. 2023, 136 (1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2022.08.030.
  2. Kariyawasan, C. C.; Hughes, D. A.; Jayatillake, M. M.; Mehta, A. B. Multiple Myeloma: Causes and Consequences of Delay in Diagnosis. QJM Int. J. Med. 2007, 100 (10), 635–640. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcm077.
  3. Hossain, M. I.; Hampson, P.; Nowell, C.; Khan, S.; Sen, R.; Sundararaman, S.; Adiyodi, J.; Basu, S. An in Depth Analysis of Factors Contributing to Diagnostic Delay in Myeloma: A Retrospective UK Study of Patients Journey from Primary Care to Specialist Secondary Care. Blood 2021, 138 (Supplement 1), 3007. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2021-150848.
  4. Palumbo, A.; Anderson, K. Multiple Myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 364 (11), 1046–1060. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1011442.
  5. SEER*Explorer: An interactive website for SEER cancer statistics [Internet]. Surveillance Research Program, National Cancer Institute; 2023 Apr 19. [updated: 2023 Jun 8; cited 2023 Jul 14]. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/statistics-network/explorer/.
  6. Schinasi LH, Brown EE, Camp NJ, Wang SS, Hofmann JN, Chiu BC, Miligi L, Beane Freeman LE, de Sanjose S, Bernstein L, Monnereau A, Clavel J, Tricot GJ, Atanackovic D, Cocco P, Orsi L, Dosman JA, McLaughlin JR, Purdue MP, Cozen W, Spinelli JJ, de Roos AJ. Multiple myeloma and family history of lymphohaematopoietic cancers: Results from the International Multiple Myeloma Consortium. Br J Haematol. 2016 Oct;175(1):87-101. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14199. Epub 2016 Jun 22. PMID: 27330041; PMCID: PMC5035512.
  7. Rajkumar, S. V.; Dimopoulos, M. A.; Palumbo, A.; Blade, J.; Merlini, G.; Mateos, M.-V.; Kumar, S.; Hillengass, J.; Kastritis, E.; Richardson, P.; Landgren, O.; Paiva, B.; Dispenzieri, A.; Weiss, B.; LeLeu, X.; Zweegman, S.; Lonial, S.; Rosinol, L.; Zamagni, E.; Jagannath, S.; Sezer, O.; Kristinsson, S. Y.; Caers, J.; Usmani, S. Z.; Lahuerta, J. J.; Johnsen, H. E.; Beksac, M.; Cavo, M.; Goldschmidt, H.; Terpos, E.; Kyle, R. A.; Anderson, K. C.; Durie, B. G. M.; Miguel, J. F. S. International Myeloma Working Group Updated Criteria for the Diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014, 15 (12), e538–e548. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70442-5.
  8. Katzmann, J. A.; Kyle, R. A.; Benson, J.; Larson, D. R.; Snyder, M. R.; Lust, J. A.; Rajkumar, S. V.; Dispenzieri, A. Screening Panels for Detection of Monoclonal Gammopathies. Clin. Chem. 2009, 55 (8), 1517–1522. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2009.126664.